Comparing the European Right to Good Administration and the US Hard Look Doctrine in the Context of Behavioral Law and Economics

Résumé fourni par la source

The work provides a comprehensive analysis of the concept of good administration, which is connected with the idea of the common interest or good, its legal framework, and its practical implications, drawing comparisons between the European and U.S. legal traditions. The core argument is that good administration is not merely a desirable moral goal, how it was until the end of the 20th century, but a current legal requirement that can be enforced through various mechanisms, including judicial review and administrative procedures. The document also explores the relationship between good administration, transparency, and the need to address cognitive biases in regulatory decision-making.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.