A probe of the maximum energetics of fast radio bursts through a prolific repeating source
Rattachement africain : nl, us, ca, gb, pl, ru, jp, se. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are sufficiently energetic to be detectable from luminosity distances up to at least seven billion parsecs (redshift z > 1). Probing the maximum energies and luminosities of FRBs constrains their emission mechanism and cosmological population. Here, we investigate the maximum energetics of a highly active repeater, FRB 20220912A, using 1500h of observations. We detect 130 high-energy bursts and find a break in the burst energy distribution, with a flattening of the power-law slope at higher energy – consistent with the behaviour of another highly active repeater, FRB 20201124A. There is a roughly equal split of integrated burst energy between the low- and high-energy regimes. Furthermore, we model the rate of the highest energy bursts and find a turnover at a characteristic spectral energy density of Echarv = 2.09+3.78-1.04 × 1032 ergHz-1. This characteristic maximum energy agrees well with observations of apparently one-off FRBs, suggesting a common physical mechanism for their emission. The extreme burst energies push radiation and source models to their limit: at this burst rate a typical magnetar (B = 1015 G) would deplete the energy stored in its magnetosphere in ∼2150h, assuming a radio efficiency ϵradio = 10-5. We find that the high-energy bursts (Ev > 3 × 1030 ergHz-1) play an important role in exhausting the energy budget of the source.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A probe of the maximum energetics of fast radio bursts through a prolific repeating source
- Date Crossref
- 08/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.