Multi-inflammatory index as a novel predictive and prognostic marker in patients with Crimean–Congo haemorrhagic fever
Rattachement africain : tr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a severe tick-borne viral infection with a high mortality rate. The multi-inflammatory index (MII), consisting of MII-1, MII-2 and MII-3, has been proposed as a prognostic biomarker in infectious diseases. However, its role in CCHF prognosis remains unclear. METHODS: This retrospective observational study analysed 290 CCHF patients admitted to Erzurum Regional Training and Research Hospital between January 2019 and September 2024. The MIIs were calculated from blood samples obtained on the day of hospital admission. Patients were categorized based on mortality outcomes, and logistic regression and receiver operating characteristics curve analyses were conducted to assess the predictive value of the MIIs. RESULTS: Mortality occurred in 9.31% of patients, with significantly higher MII-1, MII-2 and MII-3 levels in non-survivors. MII-1 showed the highest predictive accuracy (area under the curve 0.846, sensitivity 88%, specificity 75%). No significant difference was found in ribavirin administration between survivors and non-survivors. CONCLUSIONS: MIIs, particularly MII-1, serve as independent predictors of mortality in CCHF patients. Early evaluation of MII levels may aid risk stratification and clinical decision-making. Future studies should explore the dynamic changes in these indices and their impact on treatment outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Multi-inflammatory index as a novel predictive and prognostic marker in patients with Crimean–Congo haemorrhagic fever
- Date Crossref
- 07/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.