Left ventricular filling pressure by artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram, echocardiography, and cardiac catheterization

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Elevated left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP) is associated with an increased risk of heart failure and mortality. Pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) is considered the gold standard for assessing LVFP. Recently, we validated an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram (AI-ECG) to assess LV diastolic function (LVDF) and LVFP. Herein, we compare AI-ECG with PAWP in predicting long-term mortality. Methods We included adults who had comprehensive echocardiography with available ECG within 14-days and right-heart-catheterization (RHC) within 30-days of echocardiography. Elevated-LVFP was defined as PAWP>15 mmHg by RHC, grades 2-3 LVDF by echocardiography, or as adjudicated by the AI-ECG algorithm. Prognosis by AI-ECG was compared to that by echocardiography and PAWP. Results Among 4,168 patients (median age 64 years, 47.7% female), 1,841 had normal-LVFP, and 2,327 had elevated-LVFP by RHC. Echocardiography classified 1,502 patients as normal-LVFP, 1,643 as elevated-LVFP, and 1,023 as indeterminate-LVFP. AI-ECG demonstrated an area-under-the-curve of 0.879 (95%-confidence-interval 0.867-0.891) for predicting elevated-LVFP as determined by echocardiography and 0.742 (95%-confidence-interval 0.724-0.759) for predicting elevated-LVFP as determined by RHC. Over a median follow-up of 7.7 years, 2,735 (34.4%) patients died. In multivariable models, elevated-LVFP by any modality was associated with an increased risk of death (AI-ECG: adjusted-hazard-ratio 1.80, 95% confidence-interval 1.55-2.09; echocardiography: adjusted-hazard-ratio 1.74, 95% confidence-interval 1.51-2.02; PAWP: adjusted-hazard-ratio 1.26, 95% confidence-interval 1.11-1.43). AI-ECG-derived LVFP provided incremental prognostic discrimination compared to echocardiography- or RHC-derived LVFP. Conclusions AI-ECG-derived LVFP offers an accessible, affordable, and noninvasive alternative for detecting elevated LVFP, with potential independent prognostic value beyond traditional echocardiographic and invasive assessments.Survival across LVFP concordance

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.