Adequacy and Safety of Liver Biopsy Performed During Cardiac Catheterization in Patients With Fontan and Non-fontan Heart Disease
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background and Aims: Liver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis. Biopsy performed during cardiac catheterization is a unique approach performed at few centers. It allows for simultaneous hepatic and cardiac assessment and may be useful in the surveillance of Fontan-associated liver disease, a recognized complication in Fontan patients. This study reviews the indications, outcomes, and adequacy of liver biopsy performed during cardiac catheterization, with special attention to patients with Fontan-associated liver disease. Methods: A multidisciplinary, retrospective review of patients at a single quaternary-care center who underwent liver biopsy during right heart catheterization was performed. One hundred thirty liver biopsies taken between December 2011 and October 2022 were analyzed. Results: < .001). In total, 88.5% of biopsies were classified as "adequate," 9.2% were "limited," and 2.3% were "inadequate." A definitive histopathologic diagnosis was reached in 99.2% of biopsies, with the only undiagnosed specimen in the Fontan group. Conclusion: Liver biopsy during a clinically warranted cardiac catheterization can be safely performed with adequate yield and minimal complication risk. It may be useful in Fontan patients undergoing catheterization to assess Fontan-associated liver disease development.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Adequacy and Safety of Liver Biopsy Performed During Cardiac Catheterization in Patients With Fontan and Non-fontan Heart Disease
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.