Searching for strong lensing by late-type galaxies in UNIONS

Le résumé fourni par la source

Recent wide-field galaxy surveys have led to an explosion in the number of galaxy-scale strong gravitational lens candidates. However, the vast majority of them feature massive luminous red galaxies as the main deflectors, with late-type galaxies being vastly under-represented. This work presents a dedicated search for lensing by edge-on late-type galaxies in the Ultraviolet Near Infrared Optical Northern Survey (UNIONS). The search covers 3600 deg 2 of r -band observations taken from the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope. We considered all sources with magnitudes in the range 17 < r < 20.5, without any colour pre-selection, yielding a parent sample of seven million sources. We characterised our parent sample via the visual inspection of 120 000 sources selected at random. From it, we estimate, with a 68% confidence interval, that 1 in every 30 000 sources is an edge-on lens candidate, with at least eight high-quality candidates in the parent sample. This corresponds to one candidate per 17 000 edge-on late-type galaxies. Our search relied on a convolutional neural network (CNN) to select a reduced sample of candidates, which we followed with a visual inspection to curate the final sample. The CNN was trained from scratch using simulated r -band observations of edge-on lenses, and real observations of non-lenses. We found 61 good edge-on lens candidates using the CNN. Moreover, combining the CNN candidates with those found serendipitously and those identified while characterising the parent sample, we discovered 4 grade A, 20 grade B, and 58 grade C edge-on lens candidates, effectively doubling the known sample of these systems. We also discovered 16 grade A, 16 grade B, and 18 grade C lens candidates of other types. Finally, based on the characterisation of the parent sample, we estimate that our search found around 60% of the bright grade A and B edge-on lens candidates within the parent sample.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.