CoTD-PO: Chain-of-Thought Distillation with Preference Optimization
Résumé fourni par la source
Chain-of-Thought (CoT) distillation has emerged as a promising paradigm to enhance the reasoning ability of small language models by imitating the reasoning and outputs of larger teacher models.However, existing approaches suffer from a critical limitation: a distribution mismatch between teacher-generated training trajectories and the student model's own generative distribution.This mismatch leads to exposure bias during inference and often induces mode collapse or mode averaging, thereby degrading the student model's generative diversity and robustness.To address these issues, we propose CoTD-PO (Chain-of-Thought Distillation with Preference Optimization) 1 , a reinforcement learning framework that shifts the training paradigm from passive imitation to active trajectory exploration.Instead of forcing the student to imitate exact teacher traces, our method enables the student to sample its own answer paths.To support training with non-open-source teacher models, we approximate the teacher's output distribution through preference-based scoring.Furthermore, we adopt an offline iterative training procedure that enables stable and efficient optimization.Experiments on diverse open-ended generation tasks demonstrate that CoTD-PO significantly outperforms standard CoT distillation baselines, achieving higher output quality while mitigating mode collapse and preserving semantic diversity.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- CoTD-PO: Chain-of-Thought Distillation with Preference Optimization
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Association for Computational Linguistics
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.