Aller au contenu principal
2025 conference-abstract

S930 Assess Comparative Efficacy, Quality-of-Life Impact, Safety Profile, and Onset of Action of Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) vs Antacids in Adults With Rome IV-Defined Non-Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD): A Meta-Analysis

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: To assess the comparative efficacy, quality-of-life impact, safety profile, and onset of action of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) versus antacids in adults with Rome IV-defined non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), using only low-heterogeneity, low-bias randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases (2015-2023). Eligible studies directly compared esomeprazole or pantoprazole to magnesium-/aluminum-based antacids in adult NERD populations meeting Rome IV criteria. Primary outcomes included symptom relief (risk ratio [RR]) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD)-specific quality of life (GERD-HRQL). Secondary outcomes included adverse events (risk difference [RD]) and onset of symptom relief (hazard ratio [HR]). Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0. Results: Of the 1,624 record screened, 8 RCTs (N = 4,850) were included. All had low risk of bias and heterogeneity (I² < 25%). PPIs significantly improved 8-week symptom relief over antacids (RR 1.42; 95% CI 1.31-1.54; I² = 11%). Quality of life also favored PPIs (mean difference 2.27; 95% CI 2.23-3.31; I² = 0%). PPIs were associated with increased risk of hypomagnesemia (RD 0.09; 95% CI 0.05-0.12), while antacids had a slightly higher incidence of diarrhea (RD -0.08; 95% CI -0.16 to -0.01). Antacids acted significantly faster (HR 0.14; 95% CI 0.07-0.28). Conclusion: PPIs remain superior for long-term symptom control and quality of life in NERD, though antacids provide faster onset and are better tolerated in some populations. A sequential approach—initiating PPIs for sustained control with antacid rescue—may balance efficacy and tolerability. Recent impedance-pH studies further classify NERD into acid-sensitive, weakly acidic, and functional heartburn subtypes, with PPIs effective primarily in acid-sensitive subgroups. This underscores the need for phenotype-specific therapy, which our analysis addresses by isolating Rome IV-defined populations. This meta-analysis provides robust, clinically relevant evidence that PPIs offer superior long-term symptom relief and quality-of-life improvement in adults with Rome IV-defined non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). However, magnesium/aluminum-based antacids demonstrate a significantly faster onset of action and may be better tolerated in specific subgroups, such as patients with overlapping functional bowel disorders.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
S930 Assess Comparative Efficacy, Quality-of-Life Impact, Safety Profile, and Onset of Action of Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) vs Antacids in Adults With Rome IV-Defined Non-Erosive Reflux Disease (NERD): A Meta-Analysis
Date Crossref
01/10/2025
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les sujets associés

Gastroesophageal reflux and treatmentsGastrointestinal motility and disordersMicroscopic Colitis

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.