Childhood Linear Growth and Early Morbidity as Predictors of Adolescent Cognitive Ability in Malawi: A Prospective Observational Study
Résumé fourni par la source
AIM: Growth faltering and loss of development potential are common in low- and middle-income countries. We aimed to study whether linear growth before and after 2 years, height-for-age Z-score (HAZ) from 1 month until 13 years and morbidity during the first 3 years predict adolescent cognitive ability. METHODS: Cognitive assessment was done between 2018 and 2019 using Raven's coloured progressive matrices (N = 997), a measure of inductive reasoning and eye-tracking measures of saccadic speed (N = 760) and saccadic control (N = 618) among children whose mothers originally participated in a randomised clinical trial in rural Malawi. Linear regression was used to predict cognitive ability. The primary model was adjusted for age and sex, and the covariate-adjusted model for other prespecified variables. RESULTS: Saccadic control was predicted by a change in HAZ between 2 and 13 years in the adjusted model (coef -0.03, p = 0.04). Raven's score was predicted by change in HAZ between 1 month and 2 years (coef. 0.47, p < 0.05), and HAZ at 2, 5 and 13 years (coefs. 0.27-0.38, p < 0.05). Morbidity did not predict adolescent cognition. CONCLUSION: Linear growth before 2 years of age and single HAZ measurements from 2 years onwards associated with later cognitive ability measured with Raven's test, but not consistently with eye-tracking assessment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Childhood Linear Growth and Early Morbidity as Predictors of Adolescent Cognitive Ability in Malawi: A Prospective Observational Study
- Date Crossref
- 08/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.