Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms at a single center: Outcomes, selection strategy, and transparent communication for patient decision-making

Résumé fourni par la source

BackgroundThe management of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) requires a balance between procedural risks and the potential benefit of rupture prevention.ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and anatomical results of endovascular treatment for UIAs at our institution, to benchmark our practice and potential areas for improvement, and enable transparent communication with patients by providing accurate, evidence-based information.MethodsWe reviewed all patients treated for an UIA between January 2017 and July 2022. Patients were grouped according to treatment technique: simple or balloon-assisted coiling; stent-assisted coiling; or flow-diverter stent placement. Clinical outcomes included perioperative mortality, transient (<3 months), and permanent morbidity (>3 months). Anatomical results were graded with the Raymond-Roy or the O'Kelly-Marotta scales. Retreatment rates, length of hospitalization, readmissions, irradiation time, and total radiation dose were assessed.ResultsIn total, 169 patients with 201 UIAs underwent 187 endovascular procedures without death, 1% permanent morbidity, 8% transient morbidity, and 4% retreatment. The treatment subgroups analysis shows an absence of permanent morbidity associated with flow-diverter stenting and stent-assisted coiling. Simple/balloon-assisted coiling suffered 2.6% permanent morbidity. Transient morbidity was observed in 9%, 9.5%, and 6.6% of flow-diverter stenting, stent-assisted coiling, and simple/balloon-assisted coiling, respectively.ConclusionsIn our hospital, about one in a hundred procedures caused lasting problems, while about one in 25 aneurysms needed a second treatment. These results reflect our case selection and multidisciplinary approach. Reporting them transparently helps patients understand what outcomes to expect at our hospital.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.