Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

An analysis of the relevance of the Brief Pain Inventory interference items for measuring pain-related disability

3Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : be, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain interference subscale has been used as a measure of pain-related disability, a core outcome domain in the pain field. However, the pain interference subscale captures a broad range of experiences, and some items overlap with measures of distinct constructs. This overlap may inflate estimates in predictive studies and limits the precision with which treatment effects can be evaluated. To prompt reflection on appropriate use of the BPI pain interference items, this study investigated their relevance for assessing 'pain-related disability'. Participants with and without chronic pain (final sample, n=94) were presented with definitions of 'pain-related disability' and other relevant constructs, including 'pain severity', 'pain-related distress', 'depression', 'anxiety', and 'sleep disturbance'. Participants rated the degree to which items from widely used questionnaires captured the respective constructs. Linear mixed effects models examined the extent to which BPI pain interference items were rated as capturing 'pain-related disability' versus other constructs. Results indicated that the pain interference items, when considered altogether, appear to be distinct from the constructs of 'depression', 'anxiety', and 'sleep disturbance', but not from 'pain severity' and 'pain-related distress'. However, no individual item was judged to only measure 'pain-related disability' and some were judged to reflect other constructs. Although replication in a larger sample of people with pain is needed, the pain interference items capture multifaceted aspects of several constructs. Optimal use of the items requires reflection of whether they are 'fit for purpose' for the intended construct and context for which they are used. PERSPECTIVE: The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) pain interference subscale has been used as a measure of 'pain-related disability'. BPI pain interference items do not only measure 'pain-related disability'. Appropriate use of the items requires reflection of whether they are 'fit for purpose' for the intended construct and context.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
An analysis of the relevance of the Brief Pain Inventory interference items for measuring pain-related disability
Date Crossref
01/01/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPediatric Pain Management TechniquesPain Management and Opioid Use

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.