Post-Idea Generation Processes Influencing Idea Evaluation and Implementation

Le résumé fourni par la source

While an individual's evaluation of an idea often predicts their level of support, a positive evaluation does not necessarily lead to endorsement, nor endorsement to implementation. Post-evaluation obstacles and other actors may attenuate these relationships and even retroactively shift an individual's initial evaluation. However, existing research tends to discuss an individual's initial assessment or creative recognition in static terms and even conflate this with endorsement as well as conflating endorsement with implementation. This symposium explores when- and why- evaluation converges and diverges with endorsement and implementation as well the role that creators play in shaping evaluations as well as the interplay between evaluations at different levels of analysis. The interactive discussion portion of the symposium will address questions of the state, current direction, and future directions for research on post idea generation processes. The goal of this symposium is to provide new insights into how contrasting evaluations are formed, interact, diverge, and converge to influence the implementation of the evaluated idea. The Role of Disagreement in the Recognition of New Ideas Author: Davide Bavato; Author: Mark Boons; Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Author: Christian Fieseler; BI Norwegian Business School Author: Inga Jasmin Hoever; Erasmus University Rotterdam Author: Daan Alexander Stam; Erasmus University Rotterdam Navigating the Imagination Gap: How Creators Leave Space for Audience Interpretations Author: Jacob Venet; Predicting Activation and Support in Manager Responses to Employee Ideas Author: Wayne Johnson; The University of Utah Author: Jason R. Pierce; University of North Carolina at Greensboro Author: Nathan Black; Mississippi State University Disentangling person and idea: Reconceptualizing evaluation across multiple levels of analysis Author: Velvetina Siu Ching Lim;

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.