Isolation and Characterization of Pathogenic Bacteria from the Imported Artemia cysts in Bangladesh
Rattachement africain : bd. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Dormant cysts of brine shrimp (Artemia) are exclusively imported as a feed source for aquaculture industries in Bangladesh. Despite their high nutritional value, the potential introduction of exotic bacterial flora upon hatching is a growing concern. This study characterizes the bacterial community associated with commonly used Artemia cysts in Bangladesh and assesses their pathogenic potential following the current hatchery protocol. Using culture-based methods, 33 bacterial strains were isolated from encapsulated cysts post-hatching under gnotobiotic conditions. Through subsequent biochemical and 16S rRNA gene-based sequencing, 21 bacterial strains from different origins were identified as belonging to the genera Pseudomonas (n=9), Klebsiella (n=3), Enterobacter (n=4), Ralstonia (n=1), Aeromonas (n=1), and Vibrio (n=3). All 21 isolates exhibited á-hemolytic (n=8) and â-hemolytic (n=13) activities on blood agar, indicating their pathogenicity. Six of the isolated bacteria (one each from the identified genus) exhibited significant casein-protease activity and caused significant mortality in Artemia nauplii, with LD50 values ranging from 6.1 x 108 CFU/mL to 9.7 x 108 CFU/mL. The presence of these pathogenic bacteria in Artemia cysts suggests a potential biohazard, warranting their evaluation before introduction into hatcheries in Bangladesh. Bangla. J. Microbiol. 2025, Vol. 41, P: 1-8
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Isolation and Characterization of Pathogenic Bacteria from the Imported Artemia cysts in Bangladesh
- Date Crossref
- 06/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Bangladesh Academy of Sciences
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.