Quantification of Light, Photoperiod, Temperature, and Water Stress Symptoms Using Image Features for Smart Vegetable Seedling Production

Le résumé fourni par la source

Environmental factors like light, photoperiod, temperature, and water are vital for crop growth, and even slight deviations from their optimal ranges can cause seedling stress and reduce yield. Therefore, this study aimed to quantify seedling stress symptoms using image features analysis under varying light, photoperiod, temperature, and water conditions. Seedlings were grown under controlled low, normal, and high environmental conditions. Light intensity at 50 µmol m−2 s−1 (low), 250 µmol m−2 s−1 (normal), and 450 µmol m−2 s−1 (high), photoperiod cycles, 8/16 h (day/night) (low), 10/14 h (day/night) (normal), and 16/8 h (day/night) (high) day/night, temperature at 20 °C (low), 25 °C (normal), and 30 °C (high), and water availability at 1 L per day (optimal), 1 L every two days (moderate stress), and 1 L every three days (severe stress) were applied for 15 days. Commercial low-cost RGB, thermal, and depth sensors were used to collect data every day. A total of 1080 RGB images, which were pre-processed with histogram equalization and filters (Median and Gaussian), were used for noise reduction to minimize illumination effects. Morphological, color, and texture features were then analyzed using ANOVA (p < 0.05) to assess treatment effects. The result shows that the maximum canopy area for tomato was 115,226 pixels, while lettuce’s maximum plant height was 9.28 cm. However, 450 µmol m−2 s−1 light intensity caused increased surface roughness, indicating stress-induced morphological alteration. The analysis of Combined Stress Index (CSI) values indicated that the highest stress levels were 50% for pepper, 55% for tomato, 62% for cucumber, 55% for watermelon, 50% for lettuce, and 50% for pak choi. The findings showed that image-based stress detection enables precise environmental control and improves early-stage crop management.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.