Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Baseline Pain Summation Predicts Resting but Not Movement Pain Relief After Exercise in Low Back Pain

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : br, dk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Central modulatory pain mechanisms may influence improvements after exercise in low back pain (LBP). This observational study explored whether temporal summation of pain (TSP) and exercise-induced hypoalgesia (EIH) are associated with improvements in resting pain and movement-evoked pain, as it may improve the understanding of variation in effectiveness after an exercise program in individuals with LBP. METHODS: At baseline and after an 8-week exercise program, ratings of resting pain and movement-evoked pain on a 0-10 numerical rating scale (NRS) were assessed in 69 individuals with LBP. Cuff algometry at the lower leg (recording of the pain intensity to 10 repeated painful cuff stimulation) and pressure pain thresholds at the low back and leg immediately before and after a 6-min walking test were used to assess baseline TSP and EIH, respectively. Linear regression analyses adjusted for age and gender were used to assess the strength and direction of associations between baseline TSP and EIH with pain improvements (baseline minus Week 8). RESULTS: Resting-pain NRS scores were reduced by 0.9 (0.5-1.3) and movement-evoked pain by 0.9 (0.4-1.5) after 8 weeks of exercise. Higher baseline TSP was associated with improvement in resting pain (B = 0.29, p = 0.014), but not significantly with improvement in movement-evoked pain. Baseline EIH, regardless of the site point, was not significantly associated with resting or movement-evoked pain improvements. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that higher TSP at baseline is weakly but significantly associated with larger improvement in resting-pain intensity after an 8-week exercise program in people with LBP but this should be confirmed in larger studies. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Assessing central pain mechanisms may help identify individuals more likely to benefit from therapy, guiding personalised exercise-based treatments. Thus, this exploratory study provides preliminary evidence that higher baseline TSP is associated with greater improvements in resting pain following an exercise intervention. However, neither TSP nor EIH were associated with movement-evoked pain changes. These findings highlight the potential clinical relevance of evaluating central pain mechanisms when designing rehabilitation strategies for pain relief in LBP.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Baseline Pain Summation Predicts Resting but Not Movement Pain Relief After Exercise in Low Back Pain
Date Crossref
01/11/2025
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationPain Mechanisms and TreatmentsPain Management and Treatment

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.