The Impact of 70% Isopropyl Alcohol-Impregnated Disinfecting Caps on Needleless Connector Colonization in Ambulatory Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Patients
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: Totally implantable venous access devices (TIVADs) are essential in pediatric oncology but pose a risk of catheter-related infections. This study assesses the impact of 70% isopropyl alcohol-impregnated disinfecting caps on microbial colonization of needleless connectors (NCs) and extension set lumens. DESIGN: This is a single-center, open-label, prospective study. PARTICIPANTS: The study included 23 pediatric patients (50 treatment episodes) with acute lymphoblastic leukemia using TIVADs. METHODS: From April to July 2024, patients with double-lumen extension sets and needleless connectors (NCs) were included. One NC remained uncovered, while the other was capped with a 70% alcohol-impregnated disinfecting cap. Surface cultures were obtained from the uncovered NC on days 2, 3, and 4, and from the capped NC on day 4. RESULTS: Microbial colonization was significantly higher in uncovered NCs (63.3%) than in capped NCs (2%) (P < .001). Coagulase-negative staphylococci were the predominant isolates (88.4%). Intraluminal colonization was also higher in uncovered NCs (76% vs. 6%; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Alcohol-impregnated disinfecting caps significantly reduce microbial colonization of NCs and extension set lumens in pediatric oncology patients, suggesting their effectiveness in infection prevention.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The Impact of 70% Isopropyl Alcohol-Impregnated Disinfecting Caps on Needleless Connector Colonization in Ambulatory Pediatric Hematology-Oncology Patients
- Date Crossref
- 24/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.