Reliable Backscatter Communication for Distributed PV Systems: Practical Model and Experimental Validation
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Backscatter technologies promise to enable large-scale, battery-free sensor networks by modulating and reflecting ambient radio frequency (RF) carriers rather than generating new signals. Translating this potential into practical deployments—such as distributed photovoltaic (PV) power systems—necessitates realistic modeling that accounts for deployment variabilities commonly neglected in idealized analyses, including uncertain hardware insertion loss, non-ideal antenna gain, spatially varying path loss exponents, and fluctuating noise floors. In this work, we develop a practical model for reliable backscatter communications that explicitly incorporates these impairing factors, and we complement the theoretical development with empirical characterization of each contributing term. To validate the model, we implement a frequency-shift keying (FSK)-based backscatter system employing a non-coherent demodulation scheme with adaptive bit-rate matching, and we conduct comprehensive experiments to evaluate communication range and sensitivity to system parameters. Experimental results demonstrate strong agreement with theoretical predictions: the prototype tag consumes 825 µW in measured operation, and an integrated circuit (IC) implementation reduces consumption to 97.8 µW, while measured communication performance corroborates the model’s accuracy under realistic deployment conditions.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Reliable Backscatter Communication for Distributed PV Systems: Practical Model and Experimental Validation
- Date Crossref
- 05/11/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.