Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 conference-abstract

143 Immune checkpoint blockade in tumors with genomic amplification of PD-L1 and PD-L2

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Background CD274 locus (9p24.1), which harbors PD-L1, is frequently co-amplified with PD-L2. However, the clinical and immunotherapeutic implications of these co-alterations remain poorly defined.Methods Patients with tumors harboring CD274 amplified tumors (≥3 copies) were identified from MSKCC IMPACT cohort (n=95,182). Co-amplification of PD-L2 and JAK2 located in the 9p24.1 locus were also evaluated. We assessed the prognosis impact of these co-amplifications on overall survival (OS) and OS after initiation of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB).Results Among 95,182 patients in the MSKCC cohort, PD-L1 amplification was detected in 370 cases (0.4%) with a mean number of copies of 4.0 ± 0.9 (range 3-6 copies). Co-amplification of PD-L2 and JAK2 occurred in 91.2% and 75.5% of cases, respectively. Amplified tumors exhibited significantly higher aneuploidy and tumor mutational burden. Higher prevalence of PD-L1 amplification and co-amplifications were observed in HPV-associated cancers (anal, vaginal, penile, cervical, head and neck) with an overall prevalence per cancer type ranging from 0.8 to 4.9%, small cell lung cancer (1.8%), bladder (0.7%), sarcoma (0.5%), and breast cancers (0.4%).Tumors with any amplification in the 9p24.1 locus had significantly shorter overall survival when compared to patients without amplification (p<10-12) regardless of tumor origin. When comparing OS based on the occurrence of co-amplifications, no significant difference was observed for PD-L1 amplified, PD-L1/PD-L2 or PD-L1/PD-L2/JAK2 co-amplification for median OS ( 21.4, 21.5 and 21.8 months, respectively).In patients receiving ICB (N=108), the median follow up was 36 months and further OS analyses were time-restricted at 3-years.Median OS from start of ICB was 21.6 months in patients with PD-L1 and PD-L2 co-amplification versus 14.7 months for patients with PD-L1 amplification alone (p=0.07). No significant difference was observed for patients harboring PD-L1/PDL2/JAK2 co-amplification compared to patients with PD-L1/PD-L2 co-amplification.In the patients, receiving anti PD-1, patients with PD-L1/PD-L2 co-amplification had higher OS compared to patients with isolated PD-L1 amplification (20.4 vs 12.1 months, p=0.05).Conclusions PD-L1 amplification is rare but recurrent across diverse tumor types, particularly HPV-associated cancers, and often co-occurs with PD-L2 and JAK2 co-amplification. Co-amplification seems to associate with improved outcomes following anti-PD-1-based therapy, potentially due to dual PD-L1/PD-L2 blockade.Ethics Approval IRB was approved for this study.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.

Titre Crossref
143 Immune checkpoint blockade in tumors with genomic amplification of <i>PD-L1</i> and <i>PD-L2</i>
Date Crossref
01/11/2025
Éditeur
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
Type
proceedings-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Cancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersMelanoma and MAPK PathwaysMultiple and Secondary Primary Cancers

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.