Conventional and industrial by-product fertilization do not induce greenhouse gas emissions in sandy soils under wild lowbush blueberry cropping in eastern Canada

Le résumé fourni par la source

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from wild lowbush blueberry (WLB) production after fertilization with conventional mineral (MIN) and organic (ORG) or industrial pulp and paper mill sludge (PPMS) and synthetic anhydrite (SA; calcic amendment; CaSO 4 ) remain unknown. We assessed nitrous oxide (N 2 O) and methane (CH 4 ) emissions following application of combined PPMS and SA under WLB production compared to MIN and ORG fertilizers during a two-year cropping cycle. A 50 kg nitrogen (N) ha −1 recommended input was broadcasted before stem emergence during the pruning phase with MIN, ORG, and PPMS treatments alongside an unfertilized control (0 N; CTL). The PPMS treatment was also combined with SA as 6 Mg ha −1 (1SA) and 12 Mg ha −1 (2SA) inputs, which were also applied alone for a total of eight treatments. The GHG emissions were monitored using non-flow-through, non-steady-state chambers during two growing seasons. The N 2 O and CH 4 emissions were unaffected by fertilizer applications. The N 2 O emissions were significantly higher during the pruning phase (0.06 ± 0.009 kg N 2 O-N ha −1 yr −1 ) than during the harvesting phase (0.03 ± 0.005 kg N 2 O-N ha −1 yr −1 ). The fertilizer-induced emission factor (FIEF) values (−0.01 ± 0.02 %) were much lower than the default 1 % used for GHG inventories. A CH 4 uptake was observed during both growing seasons, with higher uptake during the pruning phase (−2.1 ± 0.1 kg CH 4 -C ha −1 yr −1 ) than in the harvesting phase (−1.6 ± 0.1 kg CH 4 -C ha −1 yr −1 ). High aeration of sandy soils combined with low soil NO 3 contents (0.9 μg NO 3 -N cm −2 yr −1 during the pruning phase) might constrain N 2 O emissions. Proposed WLB-specific FIEF should be used in future GHG inventories to prevent emission overestimates. Further research is needed on the agronomic benefits and yield effects of combining PPMS and SA for WLB productivity.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.