Correlation Between First‐line Immunotherapy and Second‐line TKI Outcomes in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background/Aim: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved survival in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), with nivolumab (NIVO) plus ipilimumab (IPI) showing benefits in intermediate- and poor-risk patients. Despite first-line efficacy, progression is common, requiring second-line therapies. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are commonly administered after ICIs; however, the relationship between progression-free survival (PFS) in first- and second-line settings is not well defined. This study examined the correlation of PFS in patients with mRCC treated with ICIs followed by TKIs. Patients and Methods: This retrospective multicenter study analyzed 66 patients with mRCC who received NIVO + IPI as first-line therapy and subsequent TKIs between September 2018 and February 2023. Patients were stratified according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk classification. Results: Median PFS for second-line TKIs was 6.9 months, and overall survival was 17.7 months. While no significant correlation was observed between first- and second-line PFS in the overall cohort or the IMDC intermediate-risk subgroup, a significant positive correlation was found in the poor-risk group (Spearman’s rho=0.677, p=0.002). Conclusion: Treatment outcomes in poor-risk patients may exhibit a predictable response pattern across therapy lines, potentially informing personalized treatment strategies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Correlation Between First‐line Immunotherapy and Second‐line TKI Outcomes in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2025
- Éditeur
- International Institute of Anticancer Research
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.