ICU predictive factors of fibrotic changes following COVID-19 related ARDS: a RECOVIDS substudy
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary fibrotic changes (FC) following COVID-19-related ARDS represent a significant concern due to the potential respiratory complications. The identification of early predictive factors for FC and the development of predictive tools are needed to optimize patient management and outcomes. METHODS: ≥ 50%). Exclusion criteria were non-attendance at follow-up 6 ± 1 months after ICU discharge, lack of baseline or follow-up chest CT, and history of interstitial lung disease. The primary endpoint was presence of FC at follow-up CT. The secondary outcome was to identify predominant radiological patterns. RESULTS: Among 555 patients included in the RECOVIDS study, 440 were analysed, of whom 162 (36.8%) had FC at follow-up. Predictive factors for FC included older age, body mass index < 30, Charlson comorbidity index ≥ 1, invasive mechanical ventilation, early signs of FC, and greater lung involvement on baseline CT. The nomogram for predicting pulmonary FC yielded an AUC of 80.6% (95%CI (76.4-84.8)). Late organizing pneumonia was the most common pattern overall and 30 (18.5%) of the 162 patients with FC presented mainly anterior fibrosis compatible with post ventilatory changes. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of COVID-19 ARDS survivors, 36.8% exhibited FC at 6 months post-ICU discharge. The key predictors identified here could guide therapeutic and follow-up strategies.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- ICU predictive factors of fibrotic changes following COVID-19 related ARDS: a RECOVIDS substudy
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.