Agronomic and Intercropping Performance of Newly Developed Elite Cowpea Lines for the West African Savannas
Résumé fourni par la source
Cowpea production in Nigeria, the world’s largest producer, is insufficient to meet domestic demand due to significant yield gaps caused by various production constraints. Several high-yielding improved cowpea varieties have been developed and disseminated among smallholder farmers to improve productivity, but their adoption is low because breeding efforts have not adequately incorporated farmers’ and consumers’ preferred traits. To address this, a study was conducted to evaluate the performance of newly developed cowpea lines and identify those with traits preferred by farmers and consumers. Twenty-four cowpea lines were evaluated in multiple environments under sole and intercropped systems in Nigeria. The study revealed significant (p < 0.001) genotypic and genotype-by-environment interaction effects for grain yield, fodder yield, and other key agronomic traits. Three genotypes consistently outperformed the standard check, with UAM15-2157-4 exhibiting a 57.6% higher grain yield and superior seed quality. UAM15-2157-4 produced the highest grain yield (1289 kg ha−1) under the intercropping system. GGE biplot analysis identified UAM15-2157-4 as the most stable genotype across all tested environments. This genotype, along with other promising lines, possesses desirable traits such as Striga resistance, large seed size, and preferred seed coat color, making them suitable for release and adoption to improve cowpea productivity in the region.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Agronomic and Intercropping Performance of Newly Developed Elite Cowpea Lines for the West African Savannas
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.