Genome-wide analysis of heart failure yields insights into disease heterogeneity and enables prognostic prediction in the Japanese population
Résumé fourni par la source
To understand the genetic basis of heart failure (HF) in the Japanese population, we performed genome-wide association studies (GWASs) comprising 16,251 all-cause HF cases, 4254 HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) cases, 7154 HF with preserved ejection fraction cases, and 11,122 non-ischemic HF cases among 213,828 individuals and identified five novel loci. A subsequent cross-ancestry meta-analysis and multi-trait analysis of the GWAS data identified 19 novel loci in total, with 31 out of the 76 genome-wide significant loci associated with HFrEF despite its smaller sample size. Among these susceptibility loci, a common non-coding variant in TTN (rs1484116) was associated with reduced cardiac function and worse long-term mortality. We leveraged the HF meta-GWASs along with cardiac function-related GWASs to develop a polygenic risk score (PRS) for HF. The PRS successfully identified early-onset HF and those with an increased risk of long-term HF mortality. Our results shed light on the shared and distinct genetic basis of HF between Japanese and European populations and improve the clinical value of HF genetics. Analyzing genetic data from over 210,000 Japanese individuals, the authors uncover 19 novel heart failure risk loci and develop a genetic score to predict those at high risk, revealing shared and ancestry-specific genetic bases across different populations.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Genome-wide analysis of heart failure yields insights into disease heterogeneity and enables prognostic prediction in the Japanese population
- Date Crossref
- 03/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.