Abstract 4367359: Understanding the association between patient empowerment level and patient-prioritized education topics in adult congenital patient population: A descriptive cross-sectional study

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) face ongoing physical, emotional, and psychosocial challenges that impact long-term outcomes. Research is limited on how their health topic interests vary by levels of empowerment. The 15-item Gothenburg Empowerment Scale (GES) assesses CHD patient empowerment across five domains. Objective: Examine the association between patient empowerment levels and patient-prioritized health education topics among adults with CHD. Methods: This cross-sectional study included adults (≥18) with self-reported CHD enrolled in the Empower My Congenital Heart digital study. Participants completed the GES survey and responded to open-ended questions regarding information of interest to them in managing their healthcare. GES scores were divided into tertiles, and responses were grouped into patient-prioritized topics. Descriptive analysis examined associations between empowerment levels and topic preferences. Results: Of 292 eligible patients, mean age was 45.6 ± 14.7 years, 91.4% were Caucasian, and 66.4% were female. The median (25th, 75th) GES score was 62 (57, 68). The most frequently observed patient prioritized topic was CHD health knowledge (73%), followed by interest in building CHD community (52.7%), lifestyle management (23.6%), health care navigation (7.2%), research and representation (5.1%). Participants in the lower and middle GES tertiles more frequently expressed interest in foundational sub-topics such as understanding CHD and surgical history, finding ACHD specialists, exercise and nutrition. In contrast, participants in the highest GES tertile prioritized sub-topics related to aging with CHD, managing menopause, CHD research and legislative activities. Peer support was a common topic across all groups (Figure 1). Patient quotes were stratified by tertile and patient prioritized health topics and subtopics as summarized in table 1. Conclusion: Adults with CHD prioritized varied health education topics depending on their baseline empowerment levels. Those with lower GES scores prioritized foundational information and guidance, while those with higher scores prioritized community-oriented and research-related topics. These findings could help tailor CHD patient-centered education strategies based on individual empowerment profiles.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.