Aller au contenu principal
2025 conference-abstract

Abstract 4363332: Comparative Efficacy of Cangrelor in Patients Undergoing PCI in the setting of Cardiogenic Shock or Cardiac Arrest: Insights from Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) Registry

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Cangrelor has more rapid platelet inhibition compared to oral anti-platelet agents. The favorable pharmocokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cangrelor could be advantageous in high-risk acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock, conditions often associated with altered oral bioavailability of anti-platelet agents. Hypothesis: We investigated the clinical outcomes associated with cangrelor use during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for AMI complicated by cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock. Methods: All patients undergoing PCI for AMI complicated by shock or cardiac arrest and enrolled in BMC2, a multicenter clinical registry of all PCI procedures at non-federal hospitals in the state of Michigan between 4/2018-12/2024 were included. Patients treated with a Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitor were excluded. The in-hospital outcomes of mortality, major and minor bleeding, and transfusion were evaluated in a propensity-matched analysis using 4:1 greedy match with a caliper of 0.25 standard deviations of the propensity score. Results: A total of 1,850 patients were included in the propensity-matched cohort (mean age 65 years, 67.5% male, 64.5% STEMI). 370 patients received cangrelor compared with 1,480 not receiving cangrelor. 62.2% of patients had cardiogenic shock, 64.6% had cardiac arrest, and 26.8% had both cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. In patients undergoing PCI for AMI with either cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest, the administration of cangrelor was associated with increased major bleeding (13.5% vs 9.0%; p=0.024) and transfusion administration (26.2% vs 17.8%; p <0.001). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality (30.0% vs. 30.3%; p=0.950) or minor bleeding (8.2% vs. 7.1%; p=0.527). Conclusion: Cangrelor administration during PCI for AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest was not associated with a difference in in-hospital mortality but was associated with increased major bleeding and transfusions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Abstract 4363332: Comparative Efficacy of Cangrelor in Patients Undergoing PCI in the setting of Cardiogenic Shock or Cardiac Arrest: Insights from Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) Registry
Date Crossref
04/11/2025
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesAcute Myocardial Infarction ResearchMechanical Circulatory Support Devices

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.