Aller au contenu principal
2025 conference-abstract

Abstract 4362112: Outcomes of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infective Endocarditis (CIED-IE) in Dialysis Patients

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients on dialysis are particularly vulnerable to developing cardiac implantable electronic device-related infective endocarditis (CIED-IE), which carries significant morbidity and mortality. Outcomes of these patients are not well known. Research Questions: To compare outcomes of CIED-IE among patients with ESKD, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and those without CKD (no-CKD), using a nationally representative database. Methods: The National Readmission Database (2016–2022) was used to identify patients with CIED-IE using ICD-10-CM codes. Those with prosthetic valves were excluded. Patients were categorized into ESKD, CKD, and no-CKD groups. Results: We identified 22,172 patients hospitalized with CIED-IE: 1,979 (8.9%) with ESKD, 5,573 (25.1%) with CKD, and 12,233 (55.2%) without CKD. ESKD patients were younger (mean age: ESKD 66.3, CKD 76.5, no-CKD 69.9 years; P<0.001) and had a lower proportion of males (ESKD 62.6%, CKD 68.9%, no-CKD 64.1%; P<0.001). ESKD patients had the highest in-hospital mortality (ESKD 16.5%, CKD 12.0%, no-CKD 8.3%; P<0.001) and 3-month post-discharge mortality (ESKD 8.9%, CKD 3.7%, no-CKD 2.4%; P<0.001). The lead extraction rate within 3 months of CIED-IE diagnosis was highest in patients without CKD (no-CKD 24.3%, CKD 20.6%, ESKD 17.6%; P<0.001). ESKD patients also had the highest 3-month readmission rate (ESKD 52.5%, CKD 43.5%, no-CKD 37.7%; P<0.001). Stroke rates were low and showed no significant differences across groups during hospitalization (no-CKD: 0.9%, CKD: 1.2%, ESKD: 1.7%; P=0.0959) or within 3 months post-discharge (no-CKD: 0.9%, CKD: 1.0%, ESKD: 1.1%; P=0.9209). Conclusions: ESKD patients with CIED-IE experienced significantly worse outcomes, including higher in-hospital mortality, post-discharge mortality, and readmission rates, compared to those with CKD or no-CKD. ESKD patients were also the least likely to undergo lead extraction within 3 months of CIED-IE diagnosis. Stroke incidence did not significantly differ between groups during hospitalization or after discharge.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Abstract 4362112: Outcomes of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infective Endocarditis (CIED-IE) in Dialysis Patients
Date Crossref
04/11/2025
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesMechanical Circulatory Support DevicesInfective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.