Disordered Glass Nanowire Substrates Produce in Vivo‐Like Astrocyte Morphology Revealed by Low‐Coherence Holotomography
Rattachement africain : us, it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Astrocytes are essential for preserving homeostasis of the central nervous system (CNS). They regulate synaptic activity and interact with the extracellular milieu via their distinctive, star-like morphology. However, there is a lack of detailed understanding of astrocyte morphology, particularly of the in vivo phenotype that is difficult to replicate in vitro and quantify using conventional imaging techniques without exogenous labels. This study marks the first demonstration of low-coherence holotomography (LC-HT), a label-free imaging technique, for 3D quantitative assessment of astrocyte morphology cultured on nanostructured substrates, which typically presents challenges for phase-based imaging. Crucially, it is shown that disordered glass nanowire (NW) substrates can induce in vivo-like astrocyte morphology in cultured rat cortical astrocytes. Compared to traditional glass substrates, astrocytes grown on disordered glass NWs substrates exhibit enhanced process branching and greater total arbor length - features typically observed in their natural, in vivo state of advanced maturation. By combining disordered glass NW substrates with LC-HT, the approach uniquely enables high-fidelity, label-free visualization of complex astrocytic morphologies, providing a powerful platform to study how nanoscale environmental cues shape astrocyte development.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Disordered Glass Nanowire Substrates Produce in Vivo‐Like Astrocyte Morphology Revealed by Low‐Coherence Holotomography
- Date Crossref
- 03/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.