Efficacy of Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Eliminating De Novo Donor-Specific Antibodies After Lung Transplantation: Importance of Early Intervention
Résumé fourni par la source
The development of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (dnDSA) after lung transplantation (LuTX) has been increasingly linked to the onset of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD), and impaired long-term outcomes. However, the therapeutic impact of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy in patients with dnDSA remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective single-center study of LuTX recipients (2015-2019) who developed dnDSA post-transplantation and received IVIG-based therapy. Patients were classified as responders or non-responders based on post-treatment antibody clearance. Clinical, immunological and functional outcomes were compared. Among 47 patients with dnDSA and IVIG-based therapy, 23 (48.9%) achieved complete antibody elimination. Preemptive treatment, defined as initiation of IVIG therapy before onset of clinical symptoms, was found to be an independent predictor of antibody clearance (odds ratio 29.5; p = 0.013). Responders showed significantly lower baseline MFI. While differences in CLAD-free survival favored responders, they did not reach statistical significance. Preemptive IVIG therapy in asymptomatic dnDSA-positive LuTX recipients may enhance antibody clearance and reduce CLAD risk. These findings support early intervention strategies and underscore the need for prospective trials to define optimal therapeutic thresholds and timing.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Efficacy of Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Eliminating De Novo Donor-Specific Antibodies After Lung Transplantation: Importance of Early Intervention
- Date Crossref
- 03/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.