Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

To biopsy or not biopsy, that is the question - PI-RADS 3 prostate lesions – validation of clinical and radiological parameters for biopsy decision-making

13Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVES: Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) enhances prostate cancer (PCa) detection, especially when combined with targeted or MRI–ultrasound fusion biopsy. However, PI-RADS 3 lesions remain diagnostically indeterminate, with variable malignancy risk and heterogeneous clinical management. This study aims to identify clinical and radiological predictors of PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa) in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions in order to enhance risk stratification. By disentangling patient- and disease-specific characteristics from imaging findings, the study evaluates their independent prognostic value. The primary objective is to validate non-imaging parameters as reliable tools for risk stratification in indeterminate cases, thereby supporting clinical decision-making when radiological assessment alone is inconclusive. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, 671 patients with 981 PI-RADS 3 lesions underwent mpMRI and MRI–ultrasound fusion-guided transrectal biopsy, including both targeted and systematic cores. Histopathological evaluation was based on ISUP grading. Logistic regression models were used to assess associations between clinical/radiological factors and biopsy outcomes. RESULTS: Overall cancer detection per lesion was 36.9%, with csPCa detected in 15.8% of lesions and 42.8% of positive biopsies. PSA density emerged as the strongest predictor of both PCa and csPCa, while prostate volume was inversely associated. csPCa was more commonly found in patients undergoing primary biopsy and those with posterior lesion localization. In selected low-risk groups, csPCa detection was rare, suggesting potential to avoid unnecessary biopsies, with specificity reaching up to 90%. CONCLUSIONS: Overlapping benign conditions and interobserver variability contribute to uncertainty in the interpretation of PI-RADS 3 lesions with regard to the indication for biopsy. PSA density and clinical context support risk-adapted decision-making, aligning with current guideline recommendations. A personalized approach is recommended to balance the risks of under- and overdiagnosis in managing PI-RADS 3 lesions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
To biopsy or not biopsy, that is the question - PI-RADS 3 prostate lesions – validation of clinical and radiological parameters for biopsy decision-making
Date Crossref
01/11/2025
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchUrologic and reproductive health conditions

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.