Risk- and Response-Adapted Treatment in Pediatric Epstein-Barr Virus–Associated Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a rapidly progressive and often fatal disorder. This study aimed to evaluate the stratification and treatment of pediatric Epstein-Barr virus-associated HLH (EBV-HLH) based on cytokine levels and clinical condition. METHODS: Pediatric patients newly diagnosed with EBV-HLH (n = 108) were risk stratified by cytokine and clinical criteria. Six were excluded for protocol violations. RESULTS: Among the 102 evaluable patients, 61 and 41 were classified as low and high risk and initially received dexamethasone treatment and HLH-94/04 regimens, respectively. Notably, 32.4% of children (33/102) were cured by dexamethasone monotherapy. The 12-month overall survival (OS) for the entire cohort was 86.3% (95% CI, 79.6%-93.0%), with 91.8% (95% CI, 84.9%-98.7%) and 78.0% (95% CI, 65.3%-90.7%) for patients at low and high risk, respectively (P = .037). Patients at low risk whose treatment shifted from dexamethasone to the HLH-94/04 regimen presented similar 12-month OS as those initially treated with the HLH-94/04 regimen (82.1% [95% CI, 68.0%-96.2%] vs 78.0% [95% CI, 65.3%-90.7%]; P = .589). In multivariate Cox regression model, risk group and response to initial treatment at 48-72 hours thereafter were associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS: A cytokine- and clinical-based risk stratification system, combined with dynamic response assessment, enables tailored treatment for pediatric patients with EBV-HLH.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Risk- and Response-Adapted Treatment in Pediatric Epstein-Barr Virus–Associated Hemophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis
- Date Crossref
- 31/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.