El Club de Lectura: relato de una experiencia educativa en posgrado

Résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: Journal Clubs (JCs) are educational spaces where participants meet periodically to analyze and discuss scientific articles. One of the main challenges is ensuring that these activities are motivating, add value to training programs, and remain sustainable over time. Since 2009, a JC has been operating in the Department of Internal Medicine, and its most recent experience is described in this study. Development: The period analyzed was from December 2023 to August 2024, involving 56 residents from the Department and fellowship trainees from 17 sections, with between one and four members per year. The format included 60-minute in-person meetings held every two weeks, during which a different scientific article was discussed each month. Coordination was carried out by a team composed of an expert in internal medicine, a research methodology expert —who remained constant— and at least two residents or fellows, who rotated monthly. Each group selected an article, circulated it via email along with complementary educational materials and a guiding question set. Meetings emphasized interaction and debate. At the end of each session, a feedback form was distributed to gather input on the most valued aspects and areas for improvement. Results: During the study period, 18 meetings were held, with an average attendance of 30 participants, most of them residents. The topics mainly focused on research methodology. Participants appreciated the variety of articles, the interdisciplinary perspective, and the collaborative work in small groups. Suggestions included the need for a more clinical approach and stratifying sessions according to knowledge level. Conclusion: The JC was perceived as a valuable and engaging activity, sustained over time with good attendance. Although participation was not mandatory, it promoted the development of critical reading skills and strengthened the practice of evidence-based medicine. Improvements are planned for future editions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.