Peer Review Report For: DIALOGUE: Digital care technologies for social connection, care and support of older adults. Final Project Report. [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Introduction Despite significant social and financial investment, evidence suggests that technology-enabled care services (TECS) for older adults with assisted living needs fail to meet their potential. Simultaneously, an increasingly diverse range of care and consumer technologies are entering the market with the potential to deliver innovative, effective, cost-effective, and scalable social care services. However, there is limited evidence illustrating how novel digital technologies are currently being deployed across social care. Before high-quality evidence can be generated, we need a clearer sense of delivery, what outcomes are being achieved, and the factors influencing their implementation and adoption at scale. Methods DIALOGUE identifies the novel digital care technologies being implemented for social care services for community-dwelling older adults with assisted living needs that have the greatest potential for future social care research. Working with two local authorities and an Integrated Care Board, DIALOGUE adopted a mixed methods approach, including a rapid review of academic and professional literature regarding technology implementation in social care, three co-production partnerships with older people with assisted living needs using digital technologies in social care services, a process evaluation of social care TEC delivery, and an e-Delphi survey of TECS staff. Results Older adults using social care services identified priorities in relation to signposting and information seeking, safety, security and trust, and costs and financing technologies as key priorities. Local authorities highlighted building awareness and training in person-centred approaches to TECS, building the evidence base for TECS, and ensuring that commissioning and implementation of TECS is aligned with service user priorities. Conclusion Project findings are being used to build a programme for future research regarding effective person-centred implementation of Social Care TECS. Initial work in building this agenda includes applications for NIHR research Health Technology Assessment and Research Programme for Social Care funding during 2024–2025.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Peer Review Report For: DIALOGUE: Digital care technologies for social connection, care and support of older adults. Final Project Report. [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations]
- Date Crossref
- 31/10/2025
- Éditeur
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- Type
- peer-review
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
University of Stirling Stirling Management School pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Northumbria University Department of Nursing pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
King's College London NIHR Health and Social Care Workforce Research Unit pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
The Open University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Hertfordshire Centre for Research in Public Health and Community Care. pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Newcastle University Population Health Sciences Institute pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
London School of Economics and Political Science pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of Bristol Bristol Medical School pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Faculty of Social Science pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
School of Health pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
The London School of Economic and Political Science Care Policy and Evaluation Centre Care Policy and Evlauation Centre pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
Stirling Management School — University of Stirling, Department of Nursing — Northumbria University et NIHR Health and Social Care Workforce Research Unit — King's College London, avec 8 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.