Reverse Venous Arterialization Simplified Technique: A Novel Method to Correct an Inadvertently Created Femoral Artery to Peroneal Vein Bypass
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) presents a significant management challenge. We describe the case of an 80-year-old female with CLTI and dry gangrene who underwent a common femoral artery (CFA)-to-posterior tibial artery (PTA) bypass that remained patent but was inadvertently anastomosed to the peroneal vein, resulting in venous arterialization. Postoperatively, her gangrene progressed and pain worsened, prompting an offer of below-knee amputation. Upon presentation for a second opinion, angiography confirmed the patent but malpositioned bypass. Given her extensive comorbidities, she was considered a poor candidate for open revision. We report successful percutaneous correction using the venous arterialization simplified technique (VAST), which re-established flow from the bypass graft back into the arterial lumen of the PTA using a double-gunsight approach. A 5 × 100 mm Viabahn stent graft was deployed to bridge the bypass and PTA, followed by angioplasty of the PTA and plantar artery, restoring in-line perfusion to the plantar arch and digital runoff. At 2-month follow-up, the patient demonstrated marked wound healing and avoided amputation. This case underscores the role of innovative endovascular rescue techniques in high-risk patients with preserved distal runoff and limited surgical options.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Reverse Venous Arterialization Simplified Technique: A Novel Method to Correct an Inadvertently Created Femoral Artery to Peroneal Vein Bypass
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Elmer Press, Inc.
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.