Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Nationwide surveillance detects yellow fever and chikungunya viruses in multiple Aedes mosquito species in Nigeria

4Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
8Institutions déclarées
4Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : Nigéria, Sénégal, Cameroun, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Since the reemergence of yellow fever in 2017, the Nigeria Centre for Disease Control (NCDC) has been coordinating responses to local outbreaks with the support of the World Health Organization (WHO). The National Arbovirus and Vectors Research Centre (NAVRC) has been implementing targeted vector control interventions to mitigate the occurrence of these outbreaks. This study sought to identify the vectors driving yellow fever (YF) transmission and other public health arboviruses and their distribution across Nigeria. METHODS: Between 2017 and 2020, larvae, pupae, and adult mosquitoes were collected, largely targeting Aedes Stegomyia mosquitoes, in observational, analytical, and cross-sectional surveys conducted in sixteen YF outbreak states of Nigeria. Adult mosquitoes (field-collected or reared from immature stages) were morphologically identified, and arboviruses were detected using reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). RESULTS: Seven different Aedes mosquito species were found in 11 of the 16 states surveyed, with mosquitoes from nine states found infected with arboviruses. Aedes aegypti was the predominant species (51%), whereas Aedes africanus was the least common species (0.2%). Yellow fever virus (YFV) was detected in 33 (~ 26%) out of the 127 Aedes mosquito pools, with minimum infection rates in the ranges of 0.9 (Ae. circumluteolus) to 62.5 (Ae. luteocephalus) per 1000 mosquitoes. In addition to YFV, the chikungunya virus (CHIKV) was found in nine pools, with minimum infection rates ranging from 1.6 (Ae. aegypti) to 62.5 (Ae. luteocephalus) per 1000 mosquitoes. Except for Ae. africanus, all the Aedes species tested positive for at least one arbovirus. YFV-positive pools were found in six Aedes species (Ae. aegypti, Ae. albopictus, Ae. simpsoni complex, Ae. luteocephalus, Ae. vittatus, and Ae. circumluteolus), while CHIKV-positive pools were recorded in only two Aedes species (Ae. aegypti and Ae. luteocephalus). There was co-detection of YFV and CHIKV in Ae. luteocephalus (Benue State). Edo State had the most positive pools (16), while Nasarawa, Imo, and Anambra states had the least (one positive pool). Breteau and house indices were higher than the standard WHO transmission thresholds in all but one state, suggesting high risk for arbovirus transmission. CONCLUSIONS: In Nigeria, there is substantial risk of arbovirus transmission by Aedes mosquitoes, with YFV posing a large threat. This risk is heightened by the fact that YFV and CHIKV have been detected concurrently in vectors across outbreak locations. There is an urgent need to step up arbovirus surveillance and vector control activities across the country.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Nationwide surveillance detects yellow fever and chikungunya viruses in multiple Aedes mosquito species in Nigeria
Date Crossref
31/10/2025
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Mosquito-borne diseases and controlViral Infections and Outbreaks ResearchZoonotic diseases and public health

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.