Respiratory muscle activity and fatigue response during respiratory endurance testing in patients with spinal muscular atrophy
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To explore respiratory muscle activity and fatigue response during a respiratory endurance test (RET) in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). METHODS: Fifty-five participants with SMA types 2 and 3 performed a respiratory endurance test (RET) at 20 %-70 % of their maximum inspiratory mouth pressure (PImax). We recorded surface electromyography (sEMG) of the diaphragm, intercostal, and scalene muscles and evaluated muscle activity at onset and during the test. Respiratory muscle fatigability (RMF) was defined as the inability to complete 60 consecutive breaths during the RET. RESULTS: The diaphragm showed a significantly lower variance in activity at onset of the test compared to the intercostal and scalene muscles (p = 0.002). Participants with RMF showed fatigue of the diaphragm, indicated by a significant decrease in root mean square amplitude (p = 0.012) and median frequency (p < 0.001), compared to those without RMF. CONCLUSION: The relative activity of the diaphragm at onset of a RET remained stable at higher intensity levels, while the activity of the intercostal and scalene muscles became more variable. The diaphragm showed significant electrophysiological signs of fatigue, while accessory inspiratory muscles showed no clear electrophysiological fatigue signs. SIGNIFICANCE: The results of this study provide more insight into respiratory muscle function and fatigability in patients with SMA.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Respiratory muscle activity and fatigue response during respiratory endurance testing in patients with spinal muscular atrophy
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.