The ProSPoNS Trial: Statistical Analysis Protocol for Evaluating Efficacy of Probiotic Supplementation for Prevention of Neonatal Sepsis in 0–2-month-old Low Birth Weight Infants in India
Rattachement africain : in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Introduction: A Phase III multicentre randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the role of probiotics in the prevention of neonatal sepsis in 0–2-month-old Indian infants was conducted at six study sites in India, funded by UKRI-MRC and coordinated by ICMR. Methods and Analysis: The primary objective is to reduce the incidence of sepsis by 30%. This statistical analysis plan (SAP) identifies the procedures to be applied to the primary and secondary analyses for the ProSPoNS trial once the trial data are completed. The SAP was finalised during trial implementation, and all analyses were prospectively defined. This article briefly describes the study design and statistical methods used to analyse the primary and secondary outcomes. The SAP also outlines the planned sensitivity and subgroup analyses that will be performed to explore the robustness and generalisability of the results. The document describes methods for handling missing data, controlling for confounding variables and using statistical tests to compare the treatment groups. It also describes sensitivity or subgroup analyses that will be performed.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The ProSPoNS Trial: Statistical Analysis Protocol for Evaluating Efficacy of Probiotic Supplementation for Prevention of Neonatal Sepsis in 0–2-month-old Low Birth Weight Infants in India
- Date Crossref
- 28/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.