Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Comparing effectiveness of anthropometric and biochemical markers as predictors of cardiometabolic risk among Bangladeshi doctors

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : bd, pk. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: “Cardiometabolic risk,” in simple terms, refers to the higher chances of developing Type 2 DM, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular events in an adult. Obesity, insulin resistance, and dyslipidemia are the major contributing factors for this risk. The risk increases two to threefold with long-term stress, smoking, and a sedentary lifestyle. Objectives: Doctors, all over the world in general and in Bangladesh in particular, lead very stressful lives due to their immense professional pressure. Most of them succumb to unhealthy lifestyles while trying to cope with the academic and work-life burden. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the Anthropometric marker Waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) and the Biochemical marker Triglyceride-to-High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (TG/HDL-C) ratio as predictors of cardiometabolic risk among Bangladeshi doctors. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 200 doctors of Bangladesh Medical University (BMU), aged 30−50 years, from March 2019 to February 2020, selected through purposive sampling. Anthropometric measurements (waist circumference and height, both in cm) of the study subjects were recorded in preformed data sheets. Then their fasting serum Triglyceride & fasting serum HDL-C concentrations were estimated. All the data were then entered and processed by SPSS. Results: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive value, and Negative Predictive value of WHtR, as a diagnostic marker, were 88.1%, 23.2%, 53.9% and 66.7% respectively. Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive value, and Negative Predictive value of TG/HDL-C ratio, as a diagnostic marker, were 72.3%, 75.8%, 53.9% and 66.7% respectively. According to the cut-off value of WHtR, 85.6% of the study subjects were found to have cardiometabolic risk. Cardiometabolic risk was present in 51.5% of the male study subjects and 32% of the female study subjects, based on the cut-off value of WHtR. According to the cut-off value of the TG/HDL-C ratio, 63.5% of the study subjects were found to have cardiometabolic risk. Cardiometabolic risk was present in 66.3% of the male study subjects and 57.5% of the female study subjects, based on the cut-off value of the TG/HDL-C ratio. Conclusion: The Biochemical marker (TG/HDL-C ratio) was found to be a better predictor than the Anthropometric marker (WHtR) in predicting cardiometabolic risk among Bangladeshi doctors. [J Assoc Clin Endocrinol Diabetol Bangladesh, 2025;4(Suppl 1): S35]

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparing effectiveness of anthropometric and biochemical markers as predictors of cardiometabolic risk among Bangladeshi doctors
Date Crossref
29/10/2025
Éditeur
Bangladesh Academy of Sciences
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDermatoglyphics and Human TraitsCardiovascular Disease and Adiposity

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.