AutoSpectral improves spectral flow cytometry accuracy through optimised spectral unmixing and autofluorescence-matching at the cellular level
Rattachement africain : gb, be. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT The advent of spectral flow cytometry has seen a rapid rise in the complexity of flow cytometry experiments, allowing the construction of assays with at least 50 fluorescent parameters. To correctly determine the contributions of each fluorophore’s signal to the high parameter data an accurate unmixing matrix needs to be generated. Even with single-stained controls, however, these matrixes include errors such as spillover spread, which compounds with each additional parameter, functionally limiting panel design. An additional source of errors is heterogeneity of cellular autofluorescence, which can affect both the unmixing matrix and misalign signals when the matrix is applied to individual cells in complex cell mixtures. Here we developed AutoSpectral, a statistical approach to automate the production of minimal-residual error unmixing matrixes and pair multiple distinct multifluorescent spectra to individual cells within a mixed sample, via an R-based software tool. AutoSpectral improves unmixing accuracy, improving incorrectly assigned cell positions by up to 9000-fold, reduces spread, particularly in samples with variable autofluorescence, and allows multi-lineage analysis of mixed populations, providing superior data for spectral flow cytometry experiments.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- AutoSpectral improves spectral flow cytometry accuracy through optimised spectral unmixing and autofluorescence-matching at the cellular level
- Date Crossref
- 27/10/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.