Do penguins care about on-paper boundaries? Conservation implications of spatio-temporal winter consistency in an Antarctic sentinel species
Rattachement africain : fr, es, jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Understanding the spatial and temporal at-sea distribution of marine predators throughout their annual cycle is crucial for identifying priority areas for conservation in the Southern Ocean. However, the delimitation of boundaries of the proposed East Antarctic Marine Protected Area (EAMPA) is largely based on species' breeding distributions, overlooking seasonal and annual shifts driven by sea ice variability. We studied the non-breeding distribution and space use of a key Antarctic eco-indicator species, the Adélie penguin, by tracking 62 individuals from Terre Adélie over five years using geolocators. Moulting occurred in areas of low sea ice concentration (SIC), whereas during winter, penguins migrated on average 1550 km westward from the colony to areas along the sea ice edge with high SIC (75 %). The inter-annual overlap of wintering grounds revealed high spatio-temporal consistency, indicating productive regions. Despite variability across years, tracked individuals moulted predominantly outside the proposed EAMPA, and only 16.3 % of winter locations fell within its boundaries. These findings provide new insights into the non-breeding ecology of Adélie penguins, and highlight a relevant gap in spatial coverage of critical moulting and wintering areas of this highly mobile species in the current EAMPA proposal.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Do penguins care about on-paper boundaries? Conservation implications of spatio-temporal winter consistency in an Antarctic sentinel species
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.