Site and Formation Selection for CO2 Geological Sequestration: Research Progress and Case Analyses
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a key technology for achieving carbon neutrality goals. Relevant foreign research began in the 1970s, but overall it remains in the exploration and demonstration stage. Clarifying the geological parameters and characteristics of reservoir–caprock systems in CCS projects is of great significance to the effectiveness and safety of long-term storage. By reviewing 15 typical global CCS projects, this paper identifies that ideal reservoirs are gently structured sandstones with few faults (characterized by high porosity, high permeability, and large scale, which are conducive to CO2 diffusion) or basalts (which can react with CO2 for mineralization, enabling permanent storage). Caprocks are mainly composed of thick mudstone and shale; composite caprocks consisting of multi-layer low-permeability formations and tight interlayers within reservoirs have stronger sealing performance. Additionally, they should be far from faults, and sufficient caprock thickness is required to reduce leakage risks. Meanwhile, this paper points out the challenges faced by CCS technology, such as complex site selection, limitations in long-term monitoring, difficulties in designing injection parameters, and challenges in large-scale deployment. It proposes suggestions including establishing a quantitative site selection system, building a comprehensive monitoring network, and strengthening collaborative optimization of parameters, so as to provide a basis for safe site selection and assessment.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Site and Formation Selection for CO2 Geological Sequestration: Research Progress and Case Analyses
- Date Crossref
- 24/10/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.