Test-retest reproducibility of structural and proxy estimates of brain connectivity at rest
Rattachement africain : de, be. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
While structural connectivity (SC) reflects actual neural connections, proxy estimates of brain connectivity such as functional connectivity (FC) from functional MRI, intersubject covariance of regional gray matter volume (GMV cov ) from structural MRI, and intersubject covariance of regional 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake (FDG cov ) from PET are derived from statistical dependencies between regional measurements. Understanding reproducibility of these estimates is crucial for capturing physiological and pathological changes in brain connectivity. Here, we compared test-retest reproducibility of group-level SC, FC, GMV cov , and FDG cov in the same 55 healthy subjects at rest using a simultaneous PET/MRI acquisition protocol. Sparsity-based thresholding resulted in coefficients of variation of 2.7%, 3.1%, 3.6%, and 5.1% for SC, FDG cov , GMV cov , and FC, respectively. Strength-based thresholding resulted in relative proportion of repeatedly (test-retest) present connections (PRPC) of 77%, 56%, and 54% for GMV cov , FDG cov , and FC, respectively. Absolute PRPC were 2.50%, 0.64%, and 0.25% for FDG cov , FC, and GMV cov , respectively. Overall, stronger connections exhibited higher reproducibility, arguing in favour of thresholding as a necessary analytical step. SC was most reproducible. Among the proxy estimates, the highest absolute PRPC was found for FDG cov . FDG cov enables to study brain connectivity in a reproducible manner over the largest part of the brain.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Test-retest reproducibility of structural and proxy estimates of brain connectivity at rest
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2025
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.