Semi-parametric empirical bayes method for multiplet detection in snATAC-seq with probabilistic multi-omic integration
Résumé fourni par la source
Multiplets arise when multiple cells are captured within the same droplet during single-cell sequencing, producing hybrid molecular profiles that can distort downstream analyses. Detecting multiplets in single-nucleus ATAC-seq (snATAC-seq) data is particularly challenging due to the sparsity and overdispersion of chromatin accessibility measurements. Moreover, computational approaches that jointly leverage evidence across multiple features and data modalities are highly desirable for multiplet detection. We introduce SEBULA, a semi-parametric empirical Bayes framework for multiplet detection in snATAC-seq data. SEBULA models the singlet background directly from observed chromatin accessibility signals using fragment-level information from snATAC-seq data. This approach avoids reliance on synthetic doublets and produces classification probabilities that enable direct false discovery rate control. We further extend SEBULA to integrate complementary evidence from additional features and modalities, such as simultaneously measured gene expression profiles. Across simulations and seven multimodal datasets with hashing-based ground truth, SEBULA demonstrates improved sensitivity and specificity compared with existing snATAC-seq methods. The evidence integration framework achieves comparable or superior performance relative to state-of-the-art multiomic approaches while maintaining computational efficiency.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Semi-parametric empirical bayes method for multiplet detection in snATAC-seq with probabilistic multi-omic integration
- Date Crossref
- 29/04/2026
- Éditeur
- Public Library of Science (PLoS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.