‘I Do Take the Number Seriously, but I Don't Let My Moods Depend on It’: Negotiating Self‐Tracking Data With People Living With Long COVID in the Netherlands, Austria and Switzerland
Rattachement africain : nl, ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
For many people living with long COVID (PWLC), self-tracking has emerged as a valuable practice to monitor their illness. An examination of self-tracking practices can, therefore, shed light on the ways in which individuals navigate their care, make sense of their experiences and advocate for their needs. This study investigates how PWLC engage in self-tracking practices and how they utilise and negotiate the data generated. Based on 33 semi-structured interviews with PWLC in the Netherlands, Austria and Switzerland, we found that PWLC use self-tracking to recognise patterns and identify limits, triggers and effective interventions. The insights drawn from this are used to make informed decisions about health management strategies. Yet, self-tracking may also reify symptoms and negatively influence the subjective illness experience, exacerbating stress and anxiety. Although PWLC themselves negotiate and question their tracking data, they find a variety of responses from healthcare providers in clinical interactions. Using the concept of 'trading zone' (Kjærulff and Langstrup), we argue that although self-tracking cannot replace treatment and good care, its integration into the healthcare experience as a valuable form of patient knowledge may improve the patient-provider relationship.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- ‘I Do Take the Number Seriously, but I Don't Let My Moods Depend on It’: Negotiating Self‐Tracking Data With People Living With Long COVID in the Netherlands, Austria and Switzerland
- Date Crossref
- 24/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.