A comparative analysis of volatile organic compounds in Paeoniae Radix Alba processed using different methods
Résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Paeoniae Radix Alba (PRA) is a popular functional food, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) are a critical aspect of PRA. Different processing methods often have a certain impact on VOCs. Methods: To investigate which VOCs have changed due to different processing methods, this study utilized gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS), the Heracles NEO ultra-fast gas phase electronic nose (E-nose), and chemometric methods to compare and analyze the VOCs in PRA subjected to different processing methods: PRA (prepared slices, stir-baked, stir-baked with bran and stir-baked with wine). Results: A total of 85 VOCs were detected. Chemometric methods such as principal component analysis (PCA), cluster analysis (CA), and partial least squares regression analysis (PLS-DA) revealed that different processing methods have a significant impact on the VOCs of PRA. Among the PRA samples subjected to the three processing methods, the difference between PRA (prepared slices) and PRA (stir-baked with wine) is the largest. A higher amount of linalool oxide, is present in PRA (prepared slices) than in the other groups. The content of propanoic acid is highest in PRA (stir-baked with wine). Discussion: The differences in VOCs between PRA (stir-baked) and PRA (stir-baked with bran) are small. This study provides a theoretical basis for the development and clinical scientific application of functional foods related to PRA in the future.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A comparative analysis of volatile organic compounds in Paeoniae Radix Alba processed using different methods
- Date Crossref
- 24/10/2025
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.