Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Nasal sprays and a behavioural intervention for respiratory tract infections in primary care: 12-month follow-up of a randomised open-label trial

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
8Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb, qa, nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background The Immune Defence trial documented a short-term impact on respiratory tract infections (RTIs) for nasal sprays and a stress management and physical activity website. Aim To estimate the impact of sprays and the website after 12 months. Design and setting A four-arm parallel randomised controlled trial. Participants with comorbidities and/or ≥3 self-reported recurrent RTIs were recruited. Method Participants were randomised by online software (stratified by recurrent illness and comorbidities) to a) usual care ( n = 3451); b) Vicks First Defence (VFD) spray ( n = 3448) (two sprays/nostril, ≤6 times a day; c) isotonic saline spray ( n = 3450) (same dosing); or d) a website promoting physical activity and stress management ( n = 3450). The primary outcome was respiratory illness days. Results Usual care participants ( n = 3052) had on average 21.8 (standard deviation [SD] 35.2) illness days, reduced by VFD ( n = 3076; 17.8 [SD 27.9] days, adjusted incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.84, 99% confidence interval [CI] = 0.79 to 0.90, P <0.0001), and saline ( n = 3142; 17.7 [SD 21.1 ] days, IRR 0.83, 99% CI = 0.78 to 0.89, P <0.0001), but not the website ( n = 2811; 19.5 [SD 31.2] days, IRR 0.94, 99% CI = 0.88 to 1.01, P = 0.03). The website reduced incident infections (adjusted risk ratio [RR] 0.96, 95% CI = 0.93 to 0.99, P = 0.006). All interventions reduced symptom severity and work days lost, both spray groups reported lower intention to consult and fewer falls, and there were fewer antibiotic courses and practice visits with saline. Among those with recurrent illness, saline had the most impact on both recurrence and symptom days (RR 0.93, 95% CI = 0.87 to 0.99 and RR 0.70, 95% CI = 0.60 to 0.82, respectively). Headaches were higher for VFD and lower for saline (7.8% and 3.4%, respectively; 4.7% usual care). Conclusion Widely available, inexpensive sprays and a website promoting self-care reduce the incidence, duration, and/or severity of RTIs and have an impact on work days lost and healthcare use.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Nasal sprays and a behavioural intervention for respiratory tract infections in primary care: 12-month follow-up of a randomised open-label trial
Date Crossref
24/10/2025
Éditeur
Royal College of General Practitioners
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Pediatric health and respiratory diseasesAntibiotic Use and ResistanceRespiratory and Cough-Related Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.