Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Age-adapted versus age-independent eGFR thresholds to diagnose CKD: integrating the debate and charting a balanced path forward

4Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
11Institutions déclarées
8Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

ABSTRACT The debate over whether to use age-adapted or age-independent estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) cut-offs for diagnosing chronic kidney disease (CKD) reflects a fundamental tension between physiological understanding and clinical pragmatism. Age-adapted proponents highlight robust evidence that GFR declines naturally with age, with many healthy older adults falling below the traditional 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 threshold. They argue that fixed cut-offs risk overdiagnosing CKD in the elderly, potentially leading to unnecessary anxiety and treatment, while underrecognizing risk in younger individuals whose GFRs are abnormal for their age. Physiological and longitudinal studies support this view, suggesting age-specific percentiles may better reflect true pathology. Conversely, advocates for age-independent thresholds emphasize that age-related GFR decline is not benign. Large epidemiological studies show that older adults with an eGFR of 45–59 ml/min/1.73 m2 are at increased risk of kidney failure, cardiovascular events and mortality, even in the absence of albuminuria. They caution that redefining CKD based on age could exclude high-risk older adults from beneficial therapies and research and that ‘healthy’ reference populations may harbour undiagnosed disease. A balanced approach recognizes the physiological realities of aging while not ignoring the clinical risks associated with reduced kidney function in older adults. Individualized risk prediction tools and shared decision-making can help tailor diagnosis and management. Ultimately, moving beyond arbitrary thresholds toward a patient-centred, risk-based strategy may best serve individuals across their lifespans, ensuring that CKD diagnosis and care are both scientifically sound and clinically meaningful.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Age-adapted versus age-independent eGFR thresholds to diagnose CKD: integrating the debate and charting a balanced path forward
Date Crossref
24/10/2025
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesRenal cell carcinoma treatmentEconomic and Financial Impacts of Cancer

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.