Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

Attitudes and Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Survey Among Patients and Clinicians

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Background: Artificial intelligence clinical decision-support systems (AI-CDSS) show promise for improving blood pressure control, but limited data exist on clinicians' and patients' perceptions. This study explores both groups' views on the use of AI-CDSS in hypertension management. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey (Aug 2024–Mar 2025) of primary and secondary care clinicians in Ireland, distributed through Nephrology, Hypertension, and General Practice Societies. A parallel patient survey was conducted via hypertension clinics and community networks. Surveys were designed using the Value-Based Adoption Model (perceived risks and benefits) and refined through a Public and Patient Involvement event. Responses were collected using a 5-point Likert scale. Results: 201 clinicians and 304 patients completed surveys. Most clinicians, 84 (42%) were aged 30–39 and most patients, 192 (64%) were ≥60 years. Basic AI understanding was reported by 164 clinicians (83%) and 206 patients (67%). Willingness to use AI-CDSS was high: 138 clinicians (71%) said they would use it, and 223 patients (75%) were comfortable with their doctor using it. The leading concern among clinicians was legal liability: 148 (77%) were worried about responsibility if AI caused harm. For patients, it was lack of regulation, cited by 172 (60%). The most unanimous response was to decision conflict: 290 patients (97%) said they would follow their doctor’s recommendation over AI’s. Conclusion: Both clinicians and patients are open to AI-CDSS use in hypertension. Patients emphasised the need for stronger regulation and clinicians highlighted liability concerns. Responses strongly affirm that AI must support, not replace clinician judgment. Funding: Government Support – Non-U.S.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Attitudes and Perception of Artificial Intelligence in Hypertension: Cross-Sectional Survey Among Patients and Clinicians
Date Crossref
01/10/2025
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationHealth and Well-being Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.