Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

Conservative Management vs. Dialysis and Cognitive Function in Veterans with Advanced CKD Using Competing Risks Approaches

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: While dialysis has been the dominant treatment paradigm in advanced CKD patients progressing to ESKD, there is growing interest in conservative management (CM) as an alternative patient-centered treatment strategy for advanced CKD in certain subgroups (elderly, multi-morbid). We examined the association of CM vs. dialysis transition with cognitive dysfunction in Veterans with advanced CKD. Methods: Using linked national VA, USRDS, and Medicare data, we examined Veterans with advanced CKD (≥2 eGFRs <25 separated by ≥90 days) categorized according to receipt of CM, defined as those who did not receive dialysis within 2-yrs of the index eGFR (1st eGFR <25), vs. receipt of dialysis within 2-yrs of the index eGFR. We compared the risk of incident dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and either dementia or MCI (combined dementa/MCI) ascertained by diagnostic codes in CM vs. dialysis patients matched by propensity score (PS) in a 1:1 ratio to address confounding by indication using unadjusted and doubly-adjusted Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models to account for all-cause death as a competing risk. Results: Among 90,017 patients who met eligibility criteria, there were 15,844, 3406, and 16,858 patients who developed dementia, MCI, and combined dementia/MCI, respectively. In the unadjusted PS-matched models, transition to dialysis was associated with higher risk of incident dementia, MCI, or combined dementia/MCI compared to CM: SHRs (95%CIs) 1.36 (1.28-1.45), 1.34 (1.18-1.52), and 1.32 (1.24-1.40), respectively. Similar findings were observed in sensitivity analyses doubly-adjusted for PS covariates. Conclusion: In a national cohort of US Veterans, transition to dialysis was associated with higher risk of dementia and MCI compared to CM in analyses that accounted for death as a competing risk. Further studies are needed to determine the mechanistic pathways underlying the differential risk of cognitive dysfunction across advanced CKD treatment strategies. Funding: NIDDK Support

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Conservative Management vs. Dialysis and Cognitive Function in Veterans with Advanced CKD Using Competing Risks Approaches
Date Crossref
01/10/2025
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Dialysis and Renal Disease ManagementBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.