Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Status and influencing factors of obstetric violence: a mixed study

3Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Few researches have focused on obstetric violence in the Asia-Pacific region, necessitating an understanding of the current situation of obstetric violence and exploration of factors influencing its occurrence. This study aimed to investigate the current status and influencing factors of obstetric violence. METHODS: We used a modified obstetric violence questionnaire to understand the status of obstetric violence in women and the objective sampling method to select qualified interviewees for face-to-face semi-structured in-depth interviews. RESULTS: Seven hundred twenty-one women completed the online questionnaire, among whom 10 women participated in the in-depth interview. The current prevalence of obstetric violence was 51.6% (n = 372), with verbal violence being the most common type (82.0%, n = 305). In binary logistic regression analysis, living in countryside [OR (95% CI) = 0.592 (0.402-0.872)], private hospitals [OR (95% CI) = 0.422 (0.233-0.765)], multiparas [OR (95% CI) = 0.405 (0.273-0.601)], and having a family member accompaniment during delivery in the labor room [OR (95% CI) = 0.324 (0.177-0.59], having prenatal maternal education [OR (95% CI) = 0.583 (0.393-0.865)], and active expression of needs during childbirth [OR (95% CI) = 0.415 (0.252-0.685)] were protective factors for obstetric violence. Maternal or family members having workplace violence against medical staff during childbirth [OR (95% CI) = 5.642 (2.148-14.818)], and familiarity with obstetric violence [OR (95% CI) = 2.138 (1.360-3.360)] were risk factors for obstetric violence. Based on family support during adolescence, the risk of obstetric violence in the "Strongly supportive" group was only 0.029 times that of the "Very unsupportive" control group. Women in other age groups are at higher risk of obstetric violence than women aged ≥ 45 years. The qualitative research has analyzed five themes: needs to be strengthened humanistic care, process that needs optimization, culture of obstetric violence, needs to be strengthened human resources, and needs to be strengthened medical facilities. CONCLUSION: The current incidence of obstetric violence is moderately common level, multilevel measures are urgently needed. Efforts should focus on promoting the coverage of the "Internet + Prenatal Education" program in rural areas to raise maternal awareness. Concurrently, training for medical staff should be enhanced, and preventive measures should be incorporated into healthcare quality assessment systems.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Status and influencing factors of obstetric violence: a mixed study
Date Crossref
23/10/2025
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Maternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsIntimate Partner and Family ViolenceMaternal and fetal healthcare

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.