Speech is defined by theta-gamma coupled acoustic rhythms, mapped onto segregated populations in human early auditory cortex
Résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Theta and gamma neural dynamics dominate the human auditory cortex during speech perception and have been proposed to track syllable boundaries and encode phonemic information, respectively. To what extent these rhythms are intrinsically generated or imposed by speech acoustics remains unsolved. Applying analytic methods from neuroscience to speech audio corpora from 17 languages, we found that canonical brain features —theta, gamma, and their phase-amplitude coupling— are a robust and specific acoustic signature of speech envelope across languages. They represent syllabic rate (2–6 Hz), vocalic features (30–50 Hz), and fundamental frequency (100–150 Hz). Intracerebral (sEEG) recordings from the auditory cortex of 18 epilepsy patients revealed that theta-gamma dynamics and their coupling are absent at rest. They emerge during speech perception and are linearly driven by the acoustic envelope, consistent with an evoked origin. Nevertheless, these responses originate from distinct yet functionally interconnected neural populations, indicating that the early auditory cortex demultiplexes speech timescales. Thus, early auditory cortex mirrors theta–gamma speech rhythms across segregated neural populations. IN BRIEF Early auditory cortex demultiplexes speech: stimulus-locked gamma activity aligns theta phase with the nested acoustic structure, functionally organising speech timescales
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Speech is defined by theta-gamma coupled acoustic rhythms, mapped onto segregated populations in human early auditory cortex
- Date Crossref
- 23/10/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.